No invisability

User avatar
Kat
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:17 pm
Location: back from Mars

Re: No invisability

Post by Kat » Sun May 15, 2011 10:29 am

Pam wrote:Just hope those two new members aren't who I think they are, but I am 99% sure one of them is SCREAMMMMMM and one is a Nazimick imposter.

Come on Pam! I don't know who your suspects that you mention are, but the "perceptive" people here have already observed that the last entrant is an extreme makeover of "Style My House".
If I could get any animal it would be a dolphin. I want one bad. Me and my mom went swimming with dolphins. I was like, 'How do we get one of those?' and she was like, 'You can't get a dolphin. What are you gonna do, put it in your pool?' Miley Cyrus

User avatar
1972
Resident Contrarian
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:05 am
Contact:

Re: No invisability

Post by 1972 » Sun May 15, 2011 11:32 am

You just won't let it die will you Kim?

You seem to be the only person who just doesn't get it. On purpose I might add. I have no problems with how anyone lives their lives. I only have probles with doucheholefuckwadsdickbags that cause problems when . . .wait for it . . .THERE ARE NONE.

I call a spade a spade; you call a spade a fag apparently.

When a person insists on posting thread after thread of nothing but drunken escapades and retarded shit, I call them on it. how does this make me a homophobe again?

I love you and god bless.
Long life to you and yours.

Assgoblin.
"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." ~ P.J. O'Rourke

"God, so atrocious in the Old Testament, so attractive in the New--the Jekyl and Hyde of sacred romance." ~ M. Twain

User avatar
lkwalker
Posts: 6429
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Boycotteverything
Contact:

Re: No invisability

Post by lkwalker » Sun May 15, 2011 9:09 pm

how does this make me a homophobe again?
You are betrayed by your vocabulary.
"If you don't think to good, don't think too much." Yogi

User avatar
1972
Resident Contrarian
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:05 am
Contact:

Re: No invisability

Post by 1972 » Mon May 16, 2011 1:08 pm

lkwalker wrote:
how does this make me a homophobe again?
You are betrayed by your vocabulary.
:facepalm:
"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." ~ P.J. O'Rourke

"God, so atrocious in the Old Testament, so attractive in the New--the Jekyl and Hyde of sacred romance." ~ M. Twain

User avatar
lkwalker
Posts: 6429
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Boycotteverything
Contact:

Re: No invisability

Post by lkwalker » Mon May 16, 2011 1:37 pm

Words have meaning that trivial Lexian emoticons do not.
"If you don't think to good, don't think too much." Yogi

User avatar
1972
Resident Contrarian
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 12:05 am
Contact:

Re: No invisability

Post by 1972 » Mon May 16, 2011 2:30 pm

lkwalker wrote:Walker is trivial.
fixt
"Making fun of born-again Christians is like hunting dairy cows with a high powered rifle and scope." ~ P.J. O'Rourke

"God, so atrocious in the Old Testament, so attractive in the New--the Jekyl and Hyde of sacred romance." ~ M. Twain

User avatar
lkwalker
Posts: 6429
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Boycotteverything
Contact:

Re: No invisability

Post by lkwalker » Mon May 16, 2011 3:08 pm

No- Walker is not trivial. But feel free to hold to that premise if you must. It's comforting, no?
"If you don't think to good, don't think too much." Yogi

User avatar
TraumaT
Posts: 3547
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:53 am

Re: No invisability

Post by TraumaT » Mon May 16, 2011 5:45 pm

lkwalker wrote:Words have meaning that trivial Lexian emoticons do not.
Must not... post... wall of.... emoticons.

User avatar
Dr Exile
Posts: 2349
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:37 pm
Location: Skellig Michael

Re: No invisability

Post by Dr Exile » Tue May 17, 2011 3:09 am

Must not... post... wall of.... emoticons.
Oh what the fuck:
:) :frown: :wink: :( :-o

Your message contains too many smilies. The maximum number of smilies allowed is 5.
Credo quia absurdum.

User avatar
Dr Exile
Posts: 2349
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:37 pm
Location: Skellig Michael

Re: No invisability

Post by Dr Exile » Tue May 17, 2011 3:10 am

Your message contains too many smilies. The maximum number of smilies allowed is 5.
:shock: :? 8-) :x :P
Credo quia absurdum.

Post Reply