Speech jammer

Post Reply
User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18061
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Speech jammer

Post by Pigeon » Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:35 am

The drone of speakers who won't stop is an inevitable experience at conferences, meetings, cinemas, and public libraries.

Today, Kazutaka Kurihara at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology in Tskuba and Koji Tsukada at Ochanomizu University, both in Japan, present a radical solution: a speech-jamming device that forces recalcitrant speakers into submission.

The idea is simple. Psychologists have known for some years that it is almost impossible to speak when your words are replayed to you with a delay of a fraction of a second.

Kurihara and Tsukada have simply built a handheld device consisting of a microphone and a speaker that does just that: it records a person's voice and replays it to them with a delay of about 0.2 seconds. The microphone and speaker are directional so the device can be aimed at a speaker from a distance, like a gun.

In tests, Kurihara and Tsukada say their speech jamming gun works well: "The system can disturb remote people's speech without any physical discomfort."

Their tests also identify some curious phenomena. They say the gun is more effective when the delay varies in time and more effective against speech that involves reading aloud than against spontaneous monologue. Sadly, they report that it has no effect on meaningless sound sequences such as "aaaaarghhh".

Kurihara and Tsukada make no claims about the commercial potential of their device but list various aplications. They say it could be used to maintain silence in public libraries and to "facilitate discussion" in group meetings. "We have to establish and obey rules for proper turn-taking when speaking," they say.

That has important implications. "There are still many cases in which the negative aspects of speech become a barrier to the peaceful resolution of conflicts, " they point out.

Clearly, speech jamming has a significant future role in contributing to world peace and should obviously be installed at the United Nations with immediate effect.


User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10565
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Royal » Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:02 am

So much to say about this...
Kurihara and Tsukada have simply built a handheld device consisting of a microphone and a speaker that does just that: it records a person's voice and replays it to them with a delay of about 0.2 seconds. The microphone and speaker are directional so the device can be aimed at a speaker from a distance, like a gun.
So they are creating more noise. IF you can't stop a person or crowd with "can you please be quiet" I doubt that weoponized noise will work.
In tests, Kurihara and Tsukada say their speech jamming gun works well: "The system can disturb remote people's speech without any physical discomfort."
If you want physical discomfort, you should see our next show room.
Their tests also identify some curious phenomena. They say the gun is more effective when the delay varies in time and more effective against speech that involves reading aloud than against spontaneous monologue. Sadly, they report that it has no effect on meaningless sound sequences such as "aaaaarghhh".
Ok, it will be effective against people in Fox News and CNN, but not against Rush Limbaugh.
They say it could be used to maintain silence in public libraries and to "facilitate discussion" in group meetings. "We have to establish and obey rules for proper turn-taking when speaking," they say.
So instead of teaching the importance of etiquette, courtesy, cohesion, and synergy, we can just buy sound guns?
Clearly, speech jamming has a significant future role in contributing to world peace and should obviously be installed at the United Nations with immediate effect.
Yeah, the United Nations. :?

User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10565
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Royal » Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:30 am

Image

"Sine waves combine to produce beats in nthis illustration based on oscilloscope traces. The two waves at the top are of slightly different frequency; when they are combined, the resulting wave at the bottom varies slowly in amplitude. The variations are beats and would be perceived acoustically as modulations in loudness. "

"If the two signals are presented separately in each ear, binaural beats would be heard. These differ in character from monaural, or ordinary, beats and are generated within the brain."

Speech jamming- quieting the brain.

The mechanics of the sound gun almost mimics the mechanics of binaural beats to help you quiet your mind to focus and think.

User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10565
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Royal » Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:45 am

What the, the implications of such... Wait a second...

User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18061
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Pigeon » Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:49 pm

I could see this device used to make a political speaker look inept.

It would seem hearing and processing what was just said causes some kind of loop or runaway cascade in the mind. Can another person repeat your words quickly and create the same effect.
Sine waves combine to produce beats
So you speculate the playback causes the brain to create binaural beats.

User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10565
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Royal » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:32 pm

Has the mechanics of binaural. Instead of the difference in hz, it's a difference in timing. The timing difference is creating a third frequency inside the brain.
/\_/\_/\_
.Has the mechanics of binaural. Instead of the difference in hz, it's a difference in timing. The timing difference is creating a third frequency inside the brain.

User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10565
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Royal » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:02 pm

This is probably how hive mind is created.

User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10565
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Royal » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:05 pm

What the, the implications of such... Wait a second...

User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18061
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Speech jammer

Post by Pigeon » Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:00 pm

Wouldn't different timing be a difference in phase. Guess it could work. I imagine the government has already done experiments and left some crazy people behind.

Post Reply