How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post Reply
User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18059
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post by Pigeon » Sun May 15, 2011 2:01 am

This is an interesting read about telegraph history. The 19th century was not different then today when it comes to making wealth and seizing power. Good to know corruption isn't new, but is ingrained in America.

Names like Western Union and AP don't have the cleanest history.

The article is a tie to the concerns over then internet's future today.

A couple of parts of it...read the rest at the link.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news ... ternet.ars

Hayessociated Press

Three years before Sumner wrote his lament, the country was wracked by the most convulsive presidential election since the outbreak of the Civil War: Democrat Samuel Tilden of New York versus Republican Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio. The Republican party had split between loyalists to the administration of Ulysses S. Grant and those appalled by its corruption. In truth, the resurgent Democrats were no better when it came to civic virtue, but they lured some Republicans away with Tilden, who famously battled bribery and graft as governor of New York.

When, on that November night in 1876, the popular results indicated a narrow majority for the reform candidate, many assumed the first Democratic victory in two decades. But not so at one of the Associated Press's most prestigious affiliates, the ardently pro-Republican New York Times. When prominent Democrats nervously contacted the Times asking for an update on the results, its managing editor John Reid realized that the election was still in doubt. He contacted top Republican party officials and had them spread the word via telegram—the electoral college votes in Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina were still in play.

It was easy for these men to access the telegraph system, because its main operator, Western Union, was also militantly pro-Republican. During the long controversy in Congress over who actually won the districts in the disputed election of 1876, Western Union secretly siphoned to AP's general agent Henry Nash Smith the telegraph correspondence of key Democrats during the struggle. Smith, in turn, relayed this intelligence to the Hayes camp with instructions on how to proceed. On top of that, AP constantly published propaganda supporting the Republican side of the story. Meanwhile, Western Union insisted that it kept "all messages whatsoever . . . strictly private and confidential."

Tilden supporters weren't fooled. By the end of the debacle—Hayes having won the White House—they called AP "Hayessociated Press."

The Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 sped up the construction of a coast-to-coast railroad system, and it further subsidized telegraph growth as well. But Congress provided very little regulation or oversight for the largesse.

The result was the infamous Credit Mobilier scandal of the 1870s, a scheme that bears some resemblance to the Enron debacle of 2001. Rather than license the construction of the Union Pacific railroad to an independent contractor, its Board of Directors farmed the work out to Credit Mobilier, a company that was, essentially, themselves. In turn, Credit billed the UP vastly more than the actual cost of the project. To keep Congress quiet about the affair, the firm offered stock in itself to Representatives and Senators of any political persuasion at bargain basement prices.

In this context, it should come as no surprise that the nation's telegraph system quickly fell into the hands of one of the most notorious schemers of the Gilded Age.

It was no secret why Western Union sided with Republicans. By the 1870s, the Party of Lincoln (Abe himself being a former railroad lawyer) had given away massive quantities of land for the construction of railroads and telegraphs: almost 130 million acres (about seven percent of the continental United States) was granted to eighty enterprises. Although the telegraph had been pioneered by Samuel Morse in the 1840s, the innovation didn't really take off, economically speaking, until it partnered with the railroads, at which point it became the Victorian era's version of our information superhighway.

The Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 sped up the construction of a coast-to-coast railroad system, and it further subsidized telegraph growth as well. But Congress provided very little regulation or oversight for the largesse.

The great giveaway

The result was the infamous Credit Mobilier scandal of the 1870s, a scheme that bears some resemblance to the Enron debacle of 2001. Rather than license the construction of the Union Pacific railroad to an independent contractor, its Board of Directors farmed the work out to Credit Mobilier, a company that was, essentially, themselves. In turn, Credit billed the UP vastly more than the actual cost of the project. To keep Congress quiet about the affair, the firm offered stock in itself to Representatives and Senators of any political persuasion at bargain basement prices.

In this context, it should come as no surprise that the nation's telegraph system quickly fell into the hands of one of the most notorious schemers of the Gilded Age.


User avatar
Royal
Posts: 10565
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 5:55 pm

Re: How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post by Royal » Sun May 15, 2011 2:27 am

Good stuff. :popcorn:

User avatar
Egg
Posts: 8628
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:31 pm
Location: In Your Bedroom. Hi! :D

Re: How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post by Egg » Sun May 15, 2011 2:32 am

How does this tie into the internet, man?

It's no different than the real reasons for prohibition and for making hemp illegal. It's all business.


User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18059
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post by Pigeon » Sun May 15, 2011 2:36 am

Did you read the article. The debate over net neutrality and the FCC. Who will end up with what control that people live with.

User avatar
Egg
Posts: 8628
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:31 pm
Location: In Your Bedroom. Hi! :D

Re: How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post by Egg » Sun May 15, 2011 2:41 am

Pigeon wrote:Did you read the article. The debate over net neutrality and the FCC. Who will end up with what control that people live with.
I only read the part posted here.

Eventually, the government will control internet content to a much larger degree. IF they knew how to now, they already would have.


User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18059
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post by Pigeon » Sun May 15, 2011 3:01 am

It's not just content but access, speed, cost. Who gets to make the decisions. We see how well letting corps do as they please works.

User avatar
Egg
Posts: 8628
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:31 pm
Location: In Your Bedroom. Hi! :D

Re: How Robber Barons hijacked the "Victorian Internet"

Post by Egg » Mon May 16, 2011 10:06 pm

This relates, I think, to the Op.

Sign the petition at the link, if you care to....

Worse Than China? U.S. Government Wants To Censor Search Engines And Browsers

Tell Congress to Kill COICA 2.0, the Internet Censorship Bill
We knew that members of Congress and their business allies were gearing up to pass a revised Internet Blacklist Bill -- which more than 325,000 Demand Progress members helped block last winter -- but we never expected it to be this atrocious. Last year's bill has been renamed the "PROTECT IP" Act and it is far worse than its predecessor. A summary of it is posted below.

Senators Leahy and Hatch pretended to weigh free speech concerns as they revised the bill. Instead, the new legislation would institute a China-like censorship regime in the United States, whereby the Department of Justice could force search engines, browsers, and service providers to block users' access to websites, and scrub the American Internet clean of any trace of their existence.

Furthermore, it wouldn't just be the Attorney General who could add sites to the blacklist, but the new bill would allow any copyright holder to get sites blacklisted -- sure to result in an explosion of dubious and confused orders.

Will you urge Congress to oppose the PROTECT IP Act? Just add your name at right.

PETITION TO CONGRESS: The PROTECT IP Act demonstrates an astounding lack of respect for Internet freedom and free speech rights. I urge you to oppose it.

http://act.demandprogress.org/sign/prot ... ?source=fb


Post Reply