Claimed NSA decode of ET messages

Links to other websites for further research or reading.
Post Reply
User avatar
Pigeon
Posts: 18064
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:00 pm

Claimed NSA decode of ET messages

Post by Pigeon » Tue Apr 26, 2011 2:02 pm


The Link to NSA document

Others claim it be be just material from an exercise.

More on that exercise here.

From the Victor Martinez mailing list

Victor Martinez

Official ET Disclosure? -- "NSA Document Admits ET Contact" By Kevin W. Smith | UFO Digest

BLOCKBUSTER REPORT! HAS OFFICIAL ET DISCLOSURE ARRIVED? / "NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY ADMITS EXTRATERRESTRIAL CONTACT! –
By Kevin W Smith / Submitted by Robert D Morningstar on Tuesday,
04/26/2011 - 12:34 a.m.

On Monday, October 21, 2004, the NSA approved for release to the public
a portion of their NSA Journal Vol. XIV No. 1. This is a report of a
presentation given to the NSA by Dr. Howard Campaigne regarding the
decoding of extraterrestrial messages that had been received "form outer
space."

Apparently, these messages had actually been received via the Sputnik
satellite, but no one had any idea how to decode them at the time.

At some time, unspecified in the document, Dr. Howard Campaigne and some
other NSA super mathematicians in the crypto department had been given
the task of decoding the messages. There were a total of 29 messages to
be decoded — quite an undertaking.

It is curious, to say the least, that this document was cleared for
release on October 21, 2004. Why was that?

Because the NSA did NOT release it into public information until April
21, 2011.

Though cleared for release, the NSA had been stonewalling it along with
hundreds of other NSA documents about contact with UFOs and
extraterrestrials until they lost the lawsuit brought by Peter Gersten,
a lawyer from Arizona. When they well and truly lost, the judge's order
had to be carried out, and the documents had to be released.

Dr. Howard Campaigne's "Extraterrestrial Signals"

The document, as I stated, is Dr. Campaigne's presentation to the NSA on
the decoding of those messages. It was actually published by the NSA in
their own internal NSA Journal.

Yet, they were also forced to publish a list of search terms from FOIA
requests for which they had found no NSA documents. In that list is
"Extraterrestrial Signals." The title of this document, which they
published themselves is "Key To Extraterrestrial Messages."

Quite obviously, they conveniently split hairs here in reporting they
had no information about "Extraterrestrial Signals". They knew for sure
they had this document, and that it was about what was being requested
in the FOIA request. They knew it, flaunted the technicality of wording,
and continued to stonewall.

Who is Dr. Howard Campaigne?

Dr. Campaigne is one of the top cryptologists on the planet with years
and years of service to Naval Security Group, Army Security Agency,
National Security Agency, and a couple of other such alphabet
organizations.

Howard H. Campaigne started his crypto career for the government during
World War II and has been a key and integral part of our U.S. security
and intelligence ever since. In other words, he is part of a very small,
very select group who are considered the cream of the crop in
Cryptology.

Dr. Campaigne's presentation to the NSA on decoding the extraterrestrial
messages was not a hypothetical exercise. I contacted someone who is
formerly associated with the NSA and still has TS clearance, and asked
him to view the document. I asked him to give me his take on it. There
was NO question about its authenticity since it was published in the NSA
Journal, and was released by the NSA on their Web site.

What I wanted to know was whether this document had any particular
impact or importance (other than its startling revelations) for someone
familiar with the inner workings of the NSA. It did.

My contact told me that he was blown away by the wording of the
document. He said that NSA communications are filled with words like
"possibly," "allegedly", and "thought to be."

He said, "This document has NONE of the normal NSA disclaimer words in
it. They just come out and say 'we received messages from outer space'
and this is the way to decode those messages."
I asked, "What does that mean to you?"

His reply was instant.

"Disclosure, pure and simple. They aren't making any fanfare about it,
but there it is. They have just made open disclosure."

But what do the messages say?

Dr. Campaigne focused on a set of information in a couple of the
messages that turn out to be some mathematical equations. They also
contain the listing of all the elements in our Periodic Table.

I suppose those equations may make some sense to a physicist or
engineer, but do not mean anything to me. I clearly understand how Dr.
Campaigne came to the translation since he explains it very well. But,
as to what the meaning of the equations are, I could not venture a
guess.

It is curious, though, that during his presentation Dr. Campaigne
mentions there are "words" that they have translated, and some "words"
they have not yet begun to understand. He gives an example of a
connective word that he knows is connective (joining two or more
statements) but does not yet understand the translation of that word.

Debunkers are scared as hell of the release of this information as it
PROVES beyond any doubt that they are, and always have been, dead wrong.
Their careers as debunkers are finished in light of the revelation of
this material. They are already using the only possible "tool" left to
them by saying, "That's old information. It's been out there for years."

As usual, they are either just uninformed, or outright lying. It is true
the document was cleared for release on October 21, 2004. It is true
that date is from "years". But it is also true that it WAS NOT released
until April 21, 2011.

"No, Virginia, that information has not been available for years."

Researching this development for my show, I have found a great deal of
other information that constitutes what most people would call open
disclosure.

http://kevinsmithshow.com/

THIS IS TRULY BLOCKBUSTER INFORMATION. No one from the government has
stepped in front of the cameras and come clean about ET reality as yet.

But, here we have the most secret intelligence organization in the
U.S.A., the National Security Agency, disclosing openly that there has
been contact with intelligent extraterrestrials. Not only that, we have
decoded their messages.

Want to read the document for yourself?

Here it is.

http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/u ... ssages.pdf

When you open the page, look at the address in your browser.

You will see that it is the official NSA.GOV Web site.

http://www.nsa.gov/

The NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY's FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT:

http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/foia/index.shtml

http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/foia/foia_handbook.shtml
http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/foia/...est_form.shtml

Want disclosure?

It appears to be here....

Kevin W. Smith, April 24, 2011
------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2011 / UFO Digest

http://www.ufodigest.com/article/off...-kevin-w-smith

And a couple of responses

fidelio47

Sorry, I don't buy that this is more than just a classroom exercise by NSA. If you read the below carefully it's an exercise presented by Campaigne of 29 messages from outer space.

The article then tries to develop keys for those messages that Campaigne presented. It's an NSA classroom exercise.

Sure there were no warnings, but why should there be? It was unclassified and meant for in house use.

Any real ET messages would of been classified Top Secret/Code Word. A 1962 Mj12 document mentions NSA breaking the Alien Codex, that is highly classified....Rmc

Victor Martinez wrote:
> - Show quoted text -
> http://www.ufodigest.com/article/offici ... in-w-smith

Reply
from Ralph Hartwell <ralph@spectrotek.com>

> Apparently, these messages had actually been received via the Sputnik
> satellite, but no one had any idea how to decode them at the time.

That's news to me, since AFAIK, the original Sputnik (which is what I assume
you are referring to) did not have any receiving capability; just a simple
beacon transmitter. I remember it well, listening to it on my Ham Radio
receiver as it passed overhead.

73,

Ralph W5JGV - WD2XSH/7


Post Reply