Page 12 of 14

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:35 pm
by Dr Exile
Perhaps Mr Walker could best explain the good side of socks by telling her (TT) about Ash's Uncle.

I do miss him dearly.

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:49 pm
by TraumaT
Dr Exile wrote:Perhaps Mr Walker could best explain the good side of socks by telling her (TT) about Ash's Uncle.

I do miss him dearly.
Why don't you tell me?

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:52 pm
by Egg
Snow Crash wrote:A young Ray Winstone demonstrates an excellent alternative use for socks:

I'll check it out at home ;)

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:00 am
by anarch
lkwalker wrote:I don't know why. I just do.

Why isn't being yourself with your one name good enough?


Edit: I did not see the other 12 pages BRB

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:21 am
by anarch
lkwalker wrote:It was an art in my hands. My online persona has always been as a syndicate. No-one had a problem with that until it was emulated by a bunch of douchebags. But even then- what did it matter?

LIVE UPDATES..


That would be cool to have again...

Nothing was so impressive on any of the multiverse of forums I visit (And I still have named em all and yes I am human) as live update.

Your in the middle of a post and BLAM UPDATE....

that was KING!

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:25 am
by anarch
lkwalker wrote:So you're convinced tat this Screammm character is a WITD sock? Is that Doc asshole a sock too?

I am responsible for both doc and scream.

I brought doc...Or rather he followed me from AO....Scream followed me from AP.

I am an amkoid.

I went seeking the older members like apeci , kacen , and json himself and I sought new folks too.

Still doc and scream those are my bads... or goods... depends on the perspective ....Not so fond of doc but I could ignore or look over scream... his all caps posting style never bothered me...nor his vids...although I do understand the vids can slow a computer down...something I don't think scream fully understands yet.

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:27 am
by anarch
lkwalker wrote:I agree. So where is the sock problem over there? I don't see it.

I have five socks there I think....

I named each sock anarch followed by a number.... I was argueing with jack and testing the limites of the improved ignore feature....

That is also when I learned amkon did not need a valid email addy to register.


I liked it better that way... It made the ignore /self moderation feature perfect....I did not even have to start a new thread.....I could just re-register a thousand times if I really wanted to be a prick.... but I would get tired...as any troll would.... still jack is a dipshit.

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:29 am
by anarch
Egg wrote:There's always Tor. But, I believe that Scream and Doc Viscosity are authentic.

Even I use Tor from time to time....Thank you pack.

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:29 am
by anarch
lkwalker wrote:I'm still scratching my head about the time Hazel and WITD signed in on the same computer. hahahahah

Their was something wrong with that.

Re: No socks, please..?

Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2011 6:30 am
by anarch
TraumaT wrote:
Yes, it's about trust. Simple as that.

It is.