Page 11 of 13

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:41 pm
by Egg
lkwalker wrote:I'd love to hear SCREAMMM's opinion about this but, of course, he's been pre-banned.
Congratulations, now you sound like Witch Hunt.

Screeeeaaammmmmm wasn't pre-banned. Multiple members asked us to ban him and we did. But, good for you for jumping on the bandwagon, man. Good job.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:43 pm
by SweetGrass
Yep, I will admit that I am one of the ppl who asked. He was banned AFTER signing up here.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:45 pm
by Pigeon
I'd love to hear SCREAMMM's opinion about this but, of course, he's been pre-banned.
No one is stopping you BE from going to the Kon, where the thread exists and all 3 of you are members, and asking him.

If you don't like the stuff then leave..........................................

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:45 pm
by Egg
SweetGrass wrote:Yep, I will admit that I am one of the ppl who asked. He was banned AFTER signing up here.
Thank you, SweetGrass. ;)

Some of this shit is just ridiculous.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:48 pm
by Pam
Hahahahahaha.... I may have too, if I didn't I thought it for sure and then poof he was gone ;)

I like what the Pigeon and egg are doing here, keeping it safe and fun!

Just hope those two new members aren't who I think they are, but I am 99% sure one of them is SCREAMMMMMM and one is a Nazimick imposter.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:53 pm
by Egg
Yes, as a perceptive person pointed out to me, Nazimick always uses a capital N. These guy registered with a lower case n.

Just another douche trying to cause problems.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:43 am
by lkwalker
SweetGrass wrote:Yep, I will admit that I am one of the ppl who asked. He was banned AFTER signing up here.
The guy may be a tad beyond the pale but his is a voice that ought to be heard here- especially in view of his own lifelong suffering caused by the gratuitous gay bashing that infects our vocabulary. But since that won't be the case I'll answer for him. The common homophobic characterizations, 'assgobbler,' 'fag,' 'tranniefucker'- all of it- are hurtful, bigoted and unnecessary.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:49 am
by Pam
lkwalker wrote:
SweetGrass wrote:Yep, I will admit that I am one of the ppl who asked. He was banned AFTER signing up here.
The guy may be a tad beyond the pale but his is a voice that ought to be heard here- especially in view of his own lifelong suffering caused by the gratuitous gay bashing that infects our vocabulary. But since that won't be the case I'll answer for him. The common homophobic characterizations, 'assgobbler,' 'fag,' 'tranniefucker'- all of it- are hurtful, bigoted and unnecessary.
Calling people liars and idiots is hurtful and unnecessary.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:55 am
by lkwalker
Except when it's true.

Re: No invisability

Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 4:57 am
by Pam
lkwalker wrote:Except when it's true.

Where is my lie?

Hahahahahaha, the idiot thing I can accept.