Jet Pack Guy

[Royal]

FBI should start inquiries with sponsored Red Bull people in the area.

[Pigeon]

Maybe Future youtube channel coming.

[Pigeon]

JETPACK GUY RETURNS TO LAX | "We're looking for Iron Man!"

[Pigeon]

While jetpack technology is advancing rapidly and is capable of breathtaking feats at similarly high altitudes, the ability of jetpack guy to sustain his flight long enough to be seen by several pilots is stretching the limits of what is currently thought possible in terms of fuel consumption. Even the most cutting-edge jetpacks are only capable of flying ten minutes at a time—to fly to a height of 6,000 feet, linger in the air, and return safely is an enormously demanding feat. Even if the aviator were to deploy a parachute to make the journey back to earth, they would have had to avoid detection in the skies above Los Angeles. Members of the local jetpack industry also deny making such flights or selling jetpacks to consumers.

One popular theory is that jetpack guy is really just a conventional drone carrying a mannequin. In fact, when the FBI interviewed the American Airlines pilot who saw the object, he confirmed that what he saw resembled the anthropomorphic drone shown in this video. Of course, this still raises the question, why would someone interfere with airline traffic and invite the wrath of the FBI just to fly a mannequin in restricted airspace?
Link

And this vid

[Pigeon]

Authorities think they know what's behind those jetpack sightings over Los Angeles

LOS ANGELES — Authorities investigating a series of possible jetpack sightings over Los Angeles believe they may have identified an explanation for the mysterious reports — one that requires no fuel, no engines, and no high-flying technology.

“One working theory is that pilots might have seen balloons,” the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Federal Aviation Administration said in statements after NBC Los Angeles obtained police video and photos that appear to show a human-shaped inflatable toy floating above Beverly Hills.

“There’s a very good possibility the previous ones were also balloons and pilots mistook them as jetpacks,” Aimer said. “This is a better explanation to me and to the aviation community.”

Both the FAA and FBI have said the jetpack inquiry remains an open investigation.

David Mayman, the chief executive of Los Angeles-based Jetpack Aviation, said last year that jetpacks weren’t a plausible explanation. The machines produced by his company — none of which had been sold — only hold a dozen gallons of fuel, or about 10 minutes worth, and couldn’t have reached the altitudes described by the pilots.

“To climb and descend — it takes some time to do that,” he said, adding: “You’d just be out of fuel.”

Mayman’s theory? A battery-powered drone, loaded with an inflatable mannequin and flown remotely.

Link

Weather party balloons

[Royal]

To solve, what about an Airport Police Task Force equiped with Jet Packs.

[Pigeon]

I vote yes. To soar and serve.

[Royal]

The dog fights to arrest the person will be incredible.

[Pigeon]

Oh yeah.

I am of the notion that it is not an actual person. Tech doesn't seem to fit. Never know though.

[Pigeon]